Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

CM

COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORP (CMCO)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 FY25 was softer than planned: net sales fell 7.9% YoY to $234.1M, adjusted EBITDA margin held at 16.1%, and adjusted EPS was $0.56; management cited weaker short‑cycle demand late in the quarter, European softness, and FX headwinds as key drivers .
  • Full‑year FY25 guidance was cut: revenue now “mid‑single digit decrease” YoY (from flat to low‑single digit growth) and adjusted EPS now “low‑teens decrease” (from mid‑single digit growth); capex trimmed to $18–$22M (from $20–$25M) and year‑end net leverage now ~3.0x (from ~2.3x) .
  • Strategic catalyst: CMCO announced a definitive deal to combine with Kito Crosby (all‑cash, ~$2.7B EV, ~8x TTM post‑synergy EBITDA) targeting ~$70M net cost synergies by year 3 and a pro forma 23% adjusted EBITDA margin; pro forma revenue ~$2.1B and deleveraging to ~3.0x within two years post‑close .
  • Management emphasized cost controls and footprint simplification (additional factory consolidations; Monterrey ramp) to protect margins while navigating macro and policy uncertainty; backlog remains healthy at $296.5M with long‑term mix at 56% .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Adjusted margin resilience: Adjusted gross margin of 36.8% and adjusted EBITDA margin of 16.1% held roughly flat YoY (-40 bps and -20 bps, respectively) despite a ~8% revenue decline, reflecting pricing and cost actions .
  • Strategic execution: Initiated consolidation of two additional factories under the 80/20 simplification plan; Monterrey, MX ramp progressing, with sequential adjusted gross margin up ~50 bps in Q3 .
  • Growth pockets: Orders strength in precision conveyance (+16%) and linear motion (+8%) offsets broader short‑cycle weakness; project-related backlog +3% YoY .

What Went Wrong

  • Demand deterioration and mix: Short‑cycle orders fell 6%, driving total orders down 4% YoY; lower volume and mix reduced gross profit by $9.9M vs prior year .
  • One‑time headwinds: Prior‑year favorable product liability accrual created a $2.0M YoY gross profit headwind; customs duty judgment in Mexico ($1.5M) and a $1.3M bad debt reserve also hit Q3 results .
  • FX headwinds: Unfavorable FX reduced adjusted EPS by ~$0.11 YoY (and ~$0.08 intra‑quarter), contributing to adjusted EPS of $0.56 vs $0.74 last year .

Financial Results

Quarterly performance (sequential view)

MetricQ1 FY25Q2 FY25Q3 FY25
Revenue ($M)$239.7 $242.3 $234.1
GAAP EPS$0.30 $(0.52) $0.14
Adjusted EPS$0.62 $0.70 $0.56
Gross Margin37.1% 30.9% 35.1%
Adjusted Gross Margin38.0% 36.3% 36.8%
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)$37.5 $39.2 $37.8
Adjusted EBITDA Margin15.6% 16.2% 16.1%

Year-over-year compare (Q3 FY25 vs Q3 FY24)

MetricQ3 FY24Q3 FY25YoY
Revenue ($M)$254.1 $234.1 (7.9%)
GAAP EPS$0.34 $0.14 (58.8%)
Adjusted EPS$0.74 $0.56 (24.3%)
Gross Margin36.9% 35.1% -180 bps
Adjusted Gross Margin37.2% 36.8% -40 bps
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)$41.3 $37.8 (8.6%)
Adjusted EBITDA Margin16.3% 16.1% -20 bps

Geographic mix (Q3 FY25 vs Q3 FY24)

RegionQ3 FY24 Sales ($M)Q3 FY25 Sales ($M)Mix Q3 FY24Mix Q3 FY25
U.S.$138.5 $129.5 55% 55%
Non‑U.S.$115.6 $104.6 45% 45%

KPIs and balance sheet

KPIQ1 FY25Q2 FY25Q3 FY25
Backlog ($M)$292.8 $317.6 $296.5
FCF ($M)$(15.4) $4.0 $6.2
DSO (days)63.3 64.1 61.0
Days’ Inventory121.7 110.6 121.7
Net Leverage Ratio (credit agr.)2.57x (TTM as of Q1) 2.71x (TTM as of Q2) 3.00x (TTM as of Q3)
Debt repayment (in‑period)$20M $10M $15M

Notes: Q3 drivers included lower volume/mix, prior‑year product liability accrual benefit rolling off ($2.0M), Monterrey start‑up and consolidation costs, and FX .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Net sales growthFY25Flat to low‑single digit growth YoY Mid‑single digit decrease YoY Lowered
Adjusted EPSFY25Mid‑single digit growth YoY Low‑teens decrease YoY Lowered
Capital ExpendituresFY25$20–$25M $18–$22M Lowered
Net Leverage RatioFY25 year‑end~2.3x ~3.0x Higher
Interest expense (assumption)FY25~$32M ~$32M Maintained
Amortization (assumption)FY25~$30M ~$30M Maintained
Tax rate (assumption)FY25~25% ~25% Maintained
Diluted shares (assumption)FY25~29.0M ~29.0M Maintained
DividendOngoing$0.07 per share declared (Q3) $0.07 per share declared (Q3) Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q‑2 and Q‑1)Current Period (Q3 FY25)Trend
Demand/OrdersQ2: Orders +16%, book‑to‑bill 1.08x; hurricane, Monterrey ramp and project timing hurt revenue . Q1: Sales +2%, backlog +4% QoQ; margin expansion .Orders -4% YoY, driven by short‑cycle (-6%); project funnel healthy but longer conversion; precision conveyance +16%, linear motion +8% .Softening short‑cycle; project resilience
Tariffs/PolicyNoted guidance sensitivity to macro; no acute tariff focus in Q1/Q2 releases .Policy uncertainty (tariffs) delayed U.S. decisions; Europe weak; worst‑case tariff exposure <5% of sales plus 3% potential retaliation; pass‑through history to protect margins .Increased focus and quantified exposure
Footprint/MonterreyQ1: Initiated next phase of factory consolidation (Monterrey) . Q2: Significant factory closure/start‑up costs; still pursuing 80/20 .Consolidating two additional factories; Monterrey start‑up costs continued; ~$3M benefit expected from recent consolidations .Execution continuing; benefits starting
FXNot emphasized earlier.FX cut adjusted EPS by ~$0.11 YoY and ~$0.08 intra‑quarter .Newly adverse
Product liability/One‑offsQ2: Hurricane Helene, consolidation, pension settlement .Prior‑year product liability benefit created $2.0M YoY headwind; customs duty $1.5M; bad debt reserve $1.3M .Transitory headwinds
Leverage/FCFQ1: Expected $60M FY25 debt repayment; NLR ~2.0x plan . Q2: NLR ~2.71x TTM .NLR 3.0x; expect end‑FY25 ~3x due to covenant cap accounting; FCF $6.2M in Q3; TTM FCF conversion inflated by noncash items .Higher leverage near‑term
Strategic M&AN/AAnnounced acquisition of Kito Crosby: ~$2.7B EV, ~$70M synergies (yr 3), post‑synergy ~8x EBITDA, pro forma adjusted EBITDA margin 23%; delever to ~3.0x by year 2 .Major strategic step

Management Commentary

  • “The second half of our third quarter saw a slowing of industry demand… lower than expected short‑cycle demand… The strengthening of the U.S. dollar negatively impacted earnings per share by $0.11 versus the prior year” — David J. Wilson, CEO .
  • “We are consolidating 2 smaller precision conveyance factories… expect to cease operations at the discontinued locations in the first quarter of fiscal ’26” — David J. Wilson .
  • “Adjusted EPS of $0.56 on $234 million in sales, including an $0.08 impact of unfavorable foreign exchange movements in the quarter” — David J. Wilson .
  • “We delivered third quarter net sales of $234.1 million… adjusted operating income of $25.6 million… adjusted EBITDA margin of 16.1%” — Greg Rustowicz, CFO .
  • “We have entered into an agreement to combine Kito Crosby with Columbus McKinnon… expected to deliver ~$70 million of annualized net cost synergies by end of year 3… pro forma adjusted EBITDA margin of 23%” — David J. Wilson .

Q&A Highlights

  • Synergy prioritization: Initial focus on supply chain/purchasing, operational efficiencies, duplicative structure, and overlapping third‑party expenses; revenue synergies exist but not modeled .
  • Margin/portfolio: Kito Crosby has resilient consumables exposure supporting strong margins; average ASPs low but mission‑critical safety drives replacement demand .
  • Leverage comfort: Management expects >$200M annual FCF and EBITDA growth to drive deleveraging roughly a turn per year post‑close; anticipated rate below 8% on financing .
  • Tariffs/regulatory: Worst‑case tariff exposure estimated at ~$10–$20M for CMCO pre pass‑through; Kito exposure “significantly less”; antitrust risk assessed as low, most overlap in power chain hoists .
  • Footprint and Mexico: Consolidation plans continue despite tariff noise; some product lines shift to Mexico and others to U.S.; savings still compelling .

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global/Capital IQ consensus for revenue and EPS for the latest and forward quarters was unavailable at the time of analysis due to data access limits. As a result, we cannot quantify beats/misses vs Street for Q3 FY25 or update forward estimate diffs at this time. Values from S&P Global could not be retrieved; please note unavailability.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Near‑term reset: Guidance cut on top‑line and adjusted EPS reflects late‑quarter demand softness, EU macro headwinds, and FX; expect Q4 to remain pressured as short‑cycle demand normalizes .
  • Margin defense credible: Adjusted EBITDA margin held ~16% amid volume decline; pricing, 80/20/footprint actions, and Monterrey ramp should underpin margins through the downshift .
  • Quality of backlog and project funnel: Precision conveyance/linear motion strength and healthy project funnel support medium‑term recovery as order conversion improves .
  • Transitory drags: Product liability accrual comp, Mexico duty judgment, bad debt reserve, and FX were notable one‑offs; these should fade, aiding EPS normalization as volumes recover .
  • Strategic catalyst: Kito Crosby combination materially upgrades scale, mix resilience, margins, and FCF; execution on ~$70M net cost synergies and deleveraging path are key stock drivers over 12–24 months .
  • Watch policy/tariffs: CMCO quantified manageable exposure and has pass‑through history; any clarity on policy and European macro stabilization are upside catalysts .
  • Capital allocation: Expect focus on deleveraging near‑term (to ~3.0x by two years post‑close) with dividend maintained; longer‑term optionality to reinvest in secular automation/nearshoring themes .

Appendix: Additional Detail

  • YoY revenue bridge Q3 FY25: Price +$2.3M; volume -$21.3M; FX -$1.0M .
  • YoY gross profit bridge Q3 FY25: Price/mfg +$3.9M; product liability -$2.0M; Monterrey start‑up -$2.6M; consolidation -$0.5M; volume/mix -$9.9M .
  • Backlog and long‑term mix: $296.5M backlog; long‑term backlog 56% of total .
  • Free cash flow: $6.2M in Q3; quarterly cadence reflects inventory timing, footprint costs, and unbilled revenue effects .

Sources: CMCO Q3 FY25 press release and 8‑K including full financial tables ; Q3 FY25 earnings press release (PR Newswire) ; Q3 FY25 earnings call transcript ; Kito Crosby transaction press release ; Q2 FY25 press release for prior‑quarter comps and prior guidance ; Q1 FY25 press release for trend context .